<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>We Should See Other Blogs &#187; lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/tag/lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel</link>
	<description>It&#039;s not you, it&#039;s me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>30 Things We Need / 30 Things We Don&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2011/03/09/30-things-we-need-30-things-we-dont/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2011/03/09/30-things-we-need-30-things-we-dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=2941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t usually like lists, but here&#8217;s one I can get behind: WE NEED LESS / WE NEED MORE Information / Wisdom (It&#8217;s better to understand than to know) Shallow billionaires / Passionate teachers Self-promotion / Self-awareness Multitasking / Control of our attention (Can&#8217;t do two things at one; no-one can) Inequality / Fairness (Income [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t usually like lists, but <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/schwartz/2011/03/30-things-we-need-and-30-we-do.html">here&#8217;s one I can get behind</a>: </p>
<p>WE NEED LESS / WE NEED MORE<br />
Information / Wisdom (It&#8217;s better to understand than to know)<br />
Shallow billionaires / Passionate teachers<br />
Self-promotion / Self-awareness<br />
Multitasking / Control of our attention (Can&#8217;t do two things at one; no-one can)<br />
Inequality / Fairness (Income springs to mind)<br />
Sugar / Lean protein (yes!)<br />
Action / Reflection<br />
Super sizes / Smaller portions (I need a smaller coffee cup)<br />
Private jets / High-speed trains (Ontario especially suffers from a lack of transit)<br />
Calculation / Passion (in the movies especially)<br />
Experts / Learners (experts make problems worse)<br />
Blaming / Taking responsibility<br />
Judgment / Discernment (Judging is easy; discernment is hard)<br />
Texting / Reading (Or long-form writing)<br />
Anger / Empathy (Politics especially floats on a shallow sea of outrage; it&#8217;s so tiring)<br />
Output / Depth (Don&#8217;t pay writers by the word!)<br />
Constructive criticism / Thank-you notes<br />
Possessions / Meaning (Memories and good friends don&#8217;t clutter up your house)<br />
Righteousness / Doing the right thing<br />
Answers / Curiosity (Yes! Don&#8217;t settle for the answer you get: Dig deeper)<br />
Long hours / Longer sleep (This morning says yes)<br />
Complaining / Gratitude (This is hard to do)<br />
Sitting / Moving (Everything is built around sitting; moving a lot is difficult)<br />
Selling / Authenticity (Although seeking authenticity is the opposite of authenticity)<br />
Cynicism / Realistic optimism<br />
Self-indulgence / Self-control (Ouch. This one&#8217;s for me. And banksters)<br />
Speed / Renewal<br />
Emails / Conversations (I remember the last really good conversation I had. It was with a stranger. I don&#8217;t really converse with my &#8220;friends&#8221; who on second though don&#8217;t really seem like friends at all)<br />
Winning / Win-win<br />
Immediate gratification / Sacrifice (This is starting to look like the New Testament in bullet points here)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2011/03/09/30-things-we-need-30-things-we-dont/" rel="bookmark">30 Things We Need / 30 Things We Don&#8217;t</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2011-03-09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2011/03/09/30-things-we-need-30-things-we-dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet points on the G-20</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/06/28/bullet-points-on-the-g-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/06/28/bullet-points-on-the-g-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g-20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The G-20 site, the police build up, the protesters, the violence: It&#8217;s all artificial. The site, Toronto, was chosen to showcase the city. Yet Toronto is pretty well known on the world stage. It&#8217;s not really hidden. And a summit of this type doesn&#8217;t give anyone a real positive image, you know? They could have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>The G-20 site, the police build up, the protesters, the violence: It&#8217;s all artificial.</li>
<li>The site, Toronto, was chosen to showcase the city. Yet Toronto is pretty well known on the world stage. It&#8217;s not really hidden. And a summit of this type doesn&#8217;t give anyone a real positive image, you know? They could have chosen a remote Northern location (like Huntsville) to hold the G-20 and saved a billion dollars or so.</li>
<li>The police buildup wasn&#8217;t about the police buildup per se, and certainly wasn&#8217;t about the G-20. It was more about the Mr Harper&#8217;s crime &#038; punishment mentality (that has failed so very brutally in the US), and his desire to give more powers and more equipment to the police. They got their new toys, a shitload of money, and the power to arrest people and search bags for no reason whatsoever (a policy that has failed so brutally in the UK)</li>
<li>The protests aren&#8217;t really about anything. They&#8217;re professional protesters who like to burn &#038; break things. They bus in from other places, and the protests aren&#8217;t organic. Plus the protests were fairly small. Nothing much happened. The media are reacting like overactive children, the police are treating protesters like they&#8217;re the Vietcong, and our beloved Mayor Miller is running around flapping his hands like an angry chicken. Over a few burning police cars and a few broken windows. Compare that to, say, the 1999 WTO protest in Seattle. If anything, the protests have convincingly demonstrated that Canada is a hayseed backwater ruled by tinpot dictators and hysterical nannies.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/06/28/bullet-points-on-the-g-20/" rel="bookmark">Bullet points on the G-20</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2010-06-28.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/06/28/bullet-points-on-the-g-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compact Discs, No Particular Order</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/01/01/compact-discs-no-particular-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/01/01/compact-discs-no-particular-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact discs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=2241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush &#8211; Test For Echo Newsboys &#8211; Take Me To Your Leader The Decemberists &#8211; The Tain Air &#8211; Talkie, Walkie The Cansecos &#8211; Self-Titled Wilco &#8211; Yankee Hotel Foxtrot The Flaming Lips &#8211; Flight Test Xiu Xiu &#8211; Fabulous Muscles My Bloody Valentine &#8211; Loveless The Echoing Green &#8211; Supernova Mortal &#8211; Nu-En-Jin Van [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush &#8211; Test For Echo<br />
Newsboys &#8211; Take Me To Your Leader<br />
The Decemberists &#8211; The Tain<br />
Air &#8211; Talkie, Walkie<br />
The Cansecos &#8211; Self-Titled<br />
Wilco &#8211; Yankee Hotel Foxtrot<br />
The Flaming Lips &#8211; Flight Test<br />
Xiu Xiu &#8211; Fabulous Muscles<br />
My Bloody Valentine &#8211; Loveless<br />
The Echoing Green &#8211; Supernova<br />
Mortal &#8211; Nu-En-Jin<br />
Van Halen &#8211; Balance<br />
BB King &#8211; Blues on the Bayou<br />
Benny Goodman &#8211; Greatest Hits<br />
Audio Adrenaline &#8211; Bloom<br />
Audio Adrenaline &#8211; Some Kind of Zombie<br />
Bright Eyes/Son, Ambulance &#8211; Oh Holy Fools<br />
Hillsong United &#8211; Look to You (CD + DVD)<br />
Hagood Hardy &#8211; Alone<br />
Jars of Clay &#8211; Much Afraid<br />
Jars of CLay &#8211; Self-Titled<br />
Jamie Cullum &#8211; Twentysomething<br />
Robbie Williams &#8211; Swing When You&#8217;re Winning<br />
Dashboard Confessional &#8211; MTV Unplugged<br />
Newsboys &#8211; Step Up to the Microphone<br />
Godspeed You! Black Emperor &#8211; Lift Yr Skinny Fists Like Antennas To Heaven<br />
British Sea Power &#8211; The Decline of British Sea Power<br />
Third Day &#8211; Wherever You Are<br />
Boston &#8211; Don&#8217;t Look Back<br />
Deep Purple &#8211; Perfect Stranger<br />
Mr Big &#8211; Self-Titled<br />
Lynyrd Skynyrd &#8211; Legend<br />
Nazareth &#8211; No Vibe<br />
Deep Purple &#8211; Purpendicular<br />
Aerosmith &#8211; Nine Lives<br />
Europe &#8211; The Final Countdown<br />
Godspeed You! Black Emperor &#8211; Slow Riot for the New Zero Kanada EP<br />
Russel Watson &#8211; Encore<br />
Sev Static &#8211; Speak Life<br />
Cadet &#8211; Cadet<br />
Starflyer 59 &#8211; I Am The Portugese Blues<br />
Boards &#8211; Geogaddi<br />
The Rapture &#8211; Echoes<br />
The White Stripes &#8211; Elephant<br />
Listener &#8211; Whispermoon<br />
Jars of Clay &#8211; Who We Are Instead<br />
The Shins &#8211; Chutes Too Narrow<br />
The Decemberists &#8211; Castaways and Cutouts<br />
Grandaddy &#8211; Sumday<br />
Silver Mt Zion &#8211; This Is Our Punk Rock<br />
Explosions in the Sky &#8211; Those Who Tell the Truth Shall Die, Those Who Tell the Truth Shall Live Forever<br />
Coldplay &#8211; Parachutes<br />
Derek Webb &#8211; The House Show<br />
Explosions in the Sky &#8211; The Earth is Not a Cold Dead Place<br />
DC Talk &#8211; Jesus Freak<br />
The Unicorns &#8211; Who Will Cut Our Hair When We&#8217;re Gone</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/01/01/compact-discs-no-particular-order/" rel="bookmark">Compact Discs, No Particular Order</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2010-01-01.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2010/01/01/compact-discs-no-particular-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet Points for a Wednesday Morning [Snowpocalypse Edition]</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/12/09/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-snowpocalypse-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/12/09/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-snowpocalypse-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc radio 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowpocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=2189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some things are just too long to fit on Twitter. Ironically, not this point, but still. I love how all the commercial radio stations have this dramatic music for snowfall coverage. We&#8217;re Canadians, ladies. We&#8217;ve seen hundreds of these &#8220;winter storms&#8221;.< We're not going to fall apart when the first snowflake hits us. By the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Some things are just too long to fit on Twitter. Ironically, not this point, but still.</li>
<li>I love how all the commercial radio stations have this dramatic music for snowfall coverage. We&#8217;re Canadians, ladies. We&#8217;ve seen hundreds of these &#8220;winter storms&#8221;.< We're not going to fall apart when the first snowflake hits us. By the way, this is how you know commercial news people aren't really in the business of news anymore: If they're seeking to dramatize snow, then they're in the business of entertainment. Or maybe the business of stupidity. This is why I listen to CBC Radio 1.</li>
</li>
<li>Mark Trapgillistagenstein posted <a href="http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_13935547">this article</a> about fossils in some place in the US. Now, I understand there&#8217;s a legitimate debate going on in Christianity between the creationists, the don&#8217;t-know-ers, and the full-on evolutionists. But this doesn&#8217;t excuse the lack of basic scientific knowledge that seems so frighteningly rife in Christian circles. Look what one creationist says in the article: &#8220;Secular scientists stumble over the complexities of the natural world and continue to adjust the age of Earth to fit their theories.&#8221; My jaw is still on the floor from this ignorant, anti-science, anti-intellectual bit of absolute tripe. I&#8217;m hoping that the guy was trying to say something else and the whole thing just came out wrong. But still:</li>
<ol>
<li>Scientists don&#8217;t adjust the age of the earth to fit their theories, exactly. Their theories are built on <em>evidence</em> of how old the earth actually is. To represent this as if every time some scientist takes a long hot shower and has a great idea he&#8217;ll malevolently adjust the age of the earth on a whim? That&#8217;s the height of disingenuity. Come on, even creationists have had to say that the earth looks really, really old (and come up with great reasons why God would make an old-looking earth to trick the heathen scientists into being a little more heathen).</li>
<li>It&#8217;s called the scientific method, stupid! That little process whereby we understand at least to some degree the basic structure of the universe? The process upon which all modern technology stands? Yeah, that one. Let&#8217;s not act like adjusting theories to fit evidence (and then adjusting the age of the earth to fit the theory based on the evidence) is some strange new innovation that no-one&#8217;s heard of yet.</li>
<li>You call trying to understand complexity &#8220;stumbling&#8221; over it? Okay! If we must play word games, then creationists stumble over the imperfections in design that a perfect Creator apparently caused. There are some stunningly stupid things about the human body that creationism just overlooks. Sure, there&#8217;s complexity that is easily solved by the addition of a Six-Day Creator into the mix, but there&#8217;s also a lot of bio-sloppiness going that makes that same Creator look just a bit daft. So which one is it? You can&#8217;t have both.</li>
</ol>
<li>So I need snow tires. The tires on my car aren&#8217;t bad, but they aren&#8217;t amazing either. They&#8217;re just&#8230; all-seasons. I don&#8217;t even know why they call them all-seasons. Marketing. They should call them death-in-winters.</li>
<li>Since I bought Laura a huge-ass ring for Christmas (to celebrate 2.5ish years), I also got myself an iPod touch. Really, really cool device. I hope it paves the way for a plethora of similar mobile devices with even better features. For instance, better screens, better touch controls, better predictive typing, better multi-application switching support, etc.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/12/09/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-snowpocalypse-edition/" rel="bookmark">Bullet Points for a Wednesday Morning [Snowpocalypse Edition]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2009-12-09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/12/09/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-snowpocalypse-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 Books</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/07/31/15-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/07/31/15-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supposed Rules: Don&#8217;t take too long to think about it. Fifteen books you&#8217;ve read that will always stick with you. First fifteen you can recall in no more than 15 minutes. Tag 15 friends, etc, etc. 1. The Horse and His Boy (C.S. Lewis) 2. Velvet Elvis (Rob Bell) 3. Surprised By Hope (N.T. Wright) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposed Rules: Don&#8217;t take too long to think about it. Fifteen books you&#8217;ve read that will always stick with you. First fifteen you can recall in no more than 15 minutes. Tag 15 friends, etc, etc.</p>
<p>1. The Horse and His Boy (C.S. Lewis)<br />
2. Velvet Elvis (Rob Bell)<br />
3. Surprised By Hope (N.T. Wright)<br />
4. Women, Slaves and Homosexuals (William J. Webb)<br />
5. Gardens of the Moon (Steven Erikson)<br />
6. The Darkness the Comes Before (R. Scott Bakker)<br />
7. A Short History of Nearly Everything (Bill Bryson)<br />
8. The Tipping Point (Malcolm Gladwell)<br />
9. Salt (Adam Roberts)<br />
10. Blindsight (Peter Watts)<br />
11. Dune (Frank Herbert)<br />
12. Endless Love (Scott Spencer)<br />
13. Collected Poems (Paul Auster)<br />
14. New Collected Poems (Mark Strand)<br />
15. Swiss Family Robinson (Johann David Wyss)</p>
<p>HT to Chris Hubbs on this one. I tag no-one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/07/31/15-books/" rel="bookmark">15 Books</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2009-07-31.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/07/31/15-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>25 Facts About Me</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/01/23/25-facts-about-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/01/23/25-facts-about-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for tagging me, Mr Steve Talley. I&#8217;ve needed to write something lately. 1) I think that a person can hold two opposing ideas in their head without having any cognitive dissonance whatsoever. You don&#8217;t have so be special to do so, you just have to be human. I think a lot of people have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for tagging me, Mr Steve Talley. I&#8217;ve needed to write something lately.</p>
<p>1) I think that a person can hold two opposing ideas in their head without having any cognitive dissonance whatsoever. You don&#8217;t have so be special to do so, you just have to be human. I think a lot of people have a lot of this going on and don&#8217;t realise it at all.</p>
<p>2) I bought an iPod once, thinking I would use it. I haven&#8217;t really used it and I&#8217;m pretty glad I only sprung for the 1gb model. iPods are useless to me.</p>
<p>3) Since I was 7, I&#8217;ve read Swiss Family Robinson 34 times. The last time I read it was last year, in the summer.</p>
<p>4) Laura and I went on our honeymoon to Cuba. We forgot to bring a camera. I think we were just so overwhelmed with being married that we just didn&#8217;t think about anything else, or at least not anything very clearly. Part of me is glad that we don&#8217;t have pictures so it remains one of those pleasant memories; the other half of me knows that one day I&#8217;m going to start forgetting things and I&#8217;ll wish with 100% of my being that I had pictures at that point.</p>
<p>5) Sometimes I think that there are certain bloodlines that don&#8217;t deserve to be propagated. I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t get to make those decisions: I would be incredibly harsh on my own relatives.</p>
<p>6) I don&#8217;t really like children. I can picture having some one day, but I think I&#8217;ll have to be a bit of a different person to raise them properly (or at all). Thankfully it doesn&#8217;t take long for me to become a different person, which is scary when you&#8217;re married to someone. When you&#8217;re married to someone that wants kids it&#8217;s more like a catch-22.</p>
<p>7) Back in the day I used to believe that any person could marry any person and they&#8217;d probably get on just fine. Having been married for a while to Laura, I almost want to believe that there&#8217;s one person for everyone. I mean, sure, there are some major dimensions in each other that we don&#8217;t understand (I have, for instance, never been able to sustain one of those conversations that starts with bread and ends with how our friends&#8217; children look nothing at all like them), but that makes it all the more interesting, right? In most other areas we&#8217;re so closely tailored to each other it almost looks like we were designed for each other. Which is freaky, and I understand in some sort of predestination sense that that is in fact true, but from a human perspective? Freaky. Yet I still can&#8217;t bear to bring myself to believe that ridiculous modern trope of &#8220;completion&#8221; and &#8220;other half&#8221; and whatever other crap so many people believe about love; I think I&#8217;ve settled on some sort of compromise in which some people are better for each other than others.</p>
<p>8) I love semi-colons. I really do. If you aren&#8217;t using semi-colons, you&#8217;re missing out on life. Somewhat ironically, this paragraph doesn&#8217;t have any.</p>
<p>9) If I could pick any age to live it, it would be the 1920s. This is also Laura&#8217;s pick, oddly enough. I think, though, that the 1920s I have in my head is very different from the 1920s as it existed in the real world.</p>
<p>10) There is a very active world inside my head. You don&#8217;t want to know what goes on there. Sometimes I think I&#8217;m closer to normal than I think, but when I say something odd, people react negatively; I wish I could figure out if that&#8217;s because they&#8217;re the same way and overcompensating, or because they&#8217;ve genuinely never had a strange though in their lives. I realise this entire bullet point makes me sound like I have Asperger&#8217;s. I truly hope I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>11) Books annoy me. The ones I&#8217;m supposed to like in order to &#8220;get&#8221; modern literary culture are the most boring, annoyingly cloying slog-fests imaginable. It seems that I find more enjoyment from low-brow hack-work than from what so many call &#8220;art&#8221;. I guess that&#8217;s okay, but I&#8217;m still puzzled about what they see in it. If it&#8217;s not enjoyable, why read it? Or do they really enjoy it? How? Then there are those Bourne novels that I swear you have to be only semi-literate to like. I guess I&#8217;m a half-snob.</p>
<p>12) I wish I could have one of those Star Trek experiences where you inhabit someone else&#8217;s body and then gain a better understand of what it&#8217;s like to be them and the plot resolves while you glow with new-found empathy. That never seems to happen, so I&#8217;m trapped over here trying to understand why you suck so much.</p>
<p>13) I&#8217;m a snob. I&#8217;m a snob about being a snob, though, so I think snobs suck pretty hard. This goes back to bullet point #1, maybe?</p>
<p>14) Growing up, I wasn&#8217;t allowed to watch much television, listen to much radio (except for 1010, and even then just the conservative talking heads, a phrase which on second though really doesn&#8217;t apply much to radio), listen to much music, or generally experience culture in any way. This is fine; I don&#8217;t begrudge my parents this at all because so much of it seems like crap to me. Yet its left me with this culture void where I don&#8217;t get jokes about the 80s and 90s, don&#8217;t understand the references, and what little I do know is basically from modern pop-culture referencing older pop-culture. I only started listening to popular music something like 10 years ago, and most of that was Christian music, most of which was complete shit. (If you want a reason to dislike Christian music you&#8217;re unable to find any reasons in scripture &#8212; because it isn&#8217;t there, you nitwit &#8212; try disliking it because almost the entire genre is offensively without artistic or any other value.)</p>
<p>15) I&#8217;m like to make people laugh. I identify strongly with the character of Chandler Bing on Friends, but not simply in &#8220;humour as a defense mechanism&#8221; sort of way. If you&#8217;re looking for a real me underneath the humour you&#8217;re liable to be very disappointed. I can be serious at the drop of a hat if that&#8217;s what&#8217;s called for, but at the end of the day cracking jokes is part of my identity. It helps that Laura has a wonderful sense of humour; I&#8217;ve dated girls who didn&#8217;t find me the least bit funny, and as far as I&#8217;m concerned, that&#8217;s pretty much a moral failing on their part. </p>
<p>16) I used to be that guy with the strong opinions, but I&#8217;m not that guy anymore. Okay, I am, but I have strong opinions on different things now. All those arguments we used to have in church on minor theological point? I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re important and I&#8217;m sure someone has to hash those things out, but those things aren&#8217;t important to me anymore. This doesn&#8217;t mean that I&#8217;ve become some sort of post-modern weed-smoking hippie guru chanting nonsense at the moon (I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s Sigur Ros, actually), but I&#8217;m not entirely convinced that life is a series of either right or wrong decisions whose gravity can only be measured insofar as you can tease out the logic and argue the facts. Some things just aren&#8217;t wrong or right because they weren&#8217;t made wrong or right. Some things are definitely wrong and some things are definitely right. Those are the important things.</p>
<p>17) I disagree with President Obama on many issues. Yet it seems to me that his time in office is a needed relief from the Bush administration. Bush&#8217;s terms were so awful that words almost don&#8217;t do them justice. Plus, any of the words that I could use are almost certainly not fit for public consumption.</p>
<p>18) There are times when I think I do too many things almost well enough to do publicly, but none well enough to be proud of. If I&#8217;m any indication, all those Renaissance Men were driven to distraction by the desire to do everything. </p>
<p>19) I haven&#8217;t a clue what to write here.</p>
<p>20) I wish creativity could be turned on like a tip. I admire and dislike those people who can effortlessly bang out a decent tune, but I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not one of them. I like having to wrench out words like prying up flagstones.</p>
<p>21) I own three cats. Or three cats own me. You decide.</p>
<p>22) I love Monty Python SO MUCH.</p>
<p>23) We have about two meals of real food left in the house. I fear we may starve soon.</p>
<p>24) I have never watched a horror movie in my life and I don&#8217;t intend to.</p>
<p>25) I got spam (actual spam!) for Christmas from my brother-in-law. It&#8217;s not good stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/01/23/25-facts-about-me/" rel="bookmark">25 Facts About Me</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2009-01-23.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2009/01/23/25-facts-about-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet Points for a Tuesday Evening</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/30/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-evening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/30/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-evening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how i met your mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s rare that I blog in the evening, much less that I assemble a list of bullet points in the evening, but I haven&#8217;t had a moment to slow down today. The economy may be slowing down, but business is heating up at work. We&#8217;ve had several really solid sales days. If we could keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s rare that I blog in the evening, much less that I assemble a list of bullet points in the evening, but I haven&#8217;t had a moment to slow down today.</li>
<li>The economy may be slowing down, but business is heating up at work. We&#8217;ve had several really solid sales days. If we could keep that up &#8212; by getting the salesmen to actually be on the road selling things! &#8212; we&#8217;d be rolling in it. Part of our current success is several new contracts with Bombardier and Heroux Devtek. Our tooling is knocking them dead. Though not literally, I hope.</li>
<li>Listening to Bloc Party&#8217;s <em>Silent Alarm</em> is an exercise in noticing they used to be fun and interesting to listen to but are no longer fun or interesting. Several big producers and big albums later and they&#8217;re just well-coordinated noise. Remember &#8220;Positive Tension&#8221;? Great song.</li>
<li>Nathan was playing a Collective Soul song at work today. It reminded me of a more innocent time, when the Mix 99.9 played actual music, and I was dating Laura #1. Not a particularly great time in my life, but still, a more innocent time. I drove a blue Saturn! (Was it blue?) It had those seatbelts that automatically sealed you into your seat but annoyingly required the lap belt to be done up manually. In any case, the point of this point is: Collective Soul sucks. They always have, and they always will. They aren&#8217;t innovative. They&#8217;re bland. They aren&#8217;t interesting. They&#8217;re stale. If you like them, that&#8217;s fine; just don&#8217;t expect me to share your excitement.</li>
<li>How I Met Your Mother is in the download queue! Yes!</li>
<li>It strikes me that morality is, after all, innate. <em>A priori</em>. Arts and Letters is right on that count.</li>
<li>Part of me wants the US government to bail out the banks. Another part of me wants the US government to nuke the banks from space. I&#8217;m torn.</li>
<li>Cats can really smell up a place real quick. Especially younger cats.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m reading &#8220;Dune&#8221; again right now. It&#8217;s a lot more interesting than I remember. But it&#8217;s still ruined by its surrounding novels, the prequels especially but also the sequels. Neither Herbert&#8217;s continuing vision or his son&#8217;s diving into its past have added anything to &#8220;Dune&#8221; but taken much away. It should be the only book in the canon.</li>
<li>I got something like 4 hours of sleep last night. I rather hope some of my friends&#8217; sleep problems aren&#8217;t catching or anything like that.</li>
<li>People using the laptop on the toilet really freaks me out. What if, right now, you were talking to someone and you had no idea they were sitting on the can? That&#8217;s uncool!</li>
<li>I&#8217;m making a main course for a thing our church does. It&#8217;s called &#8220;Guess Who&#8217;s Coming to Dinner&#8221; and it&#8217;s a basically a way for people to meet other people they might not know. It&#8217;s pretty much awesome, but I haven&#8217;t the foggiest clue what to make for it. Do you people have any good recipes I should make? Keep in mind I can do multiple dishes!</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/30/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-evening/" rel="bookmark">Bullet Points for a Tuesday Evening</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-09-30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/30/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-evening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet Points for a Tuesday Noon Hour</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/09/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-noon-hour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/09/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-noon-hour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you motivate people to do something they don&#8217;t want to do? Say you&#8217;re moving someone from an executive to a more sales-oriented role. And they don&#8217;t want to do it. Let&#8217;s say they use every possible excuse to avoid their new job, keep finding ways to do their old job despite access restrictions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>How do you motivate people to do something they don&#8217;t want to do? Say you&#8217;re moving someone from an executive to a more sales-oriented role. And they don&#8217;t want to do it. Let&#8217;s say they use every possible excuse to avoid their new job, keep finding ways to do their old job despite access restrictions, and in the meantime generally get in the way. Oh, and let&#8217;s say it&#8217;s in a company with only one level of management and that level of management is afraid of conflict. One more thing&#8230; it&#8217;s all family. How do you do that?</li>
<li>Hiring family is generally a mistake. Nepotism has no place in business, not simply because it&#8217;s unfair, but because it&#8217;s destructive. Hiring family makes you weak: You have to choose, sometimes, between your family and your business. And of course you choose family. Hiring family makes hard choices much, much harder.</li>
<li>I feel like playing Monopoly sometime soon. I don&#8217;t know why. I just developed a hankering for the game.</li>
<li>Do you find that in-line spell checking makes you spell better? I don&#8217;t mean, does it help you make fewer mistakes. That&#8217;s pretty obvious. I mean, does it make you more likely to spell things right the first time? Do you dread that little wavy red line?</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve finished drinking some coffee that John at church gave me. I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s Panamanian or Columbian or what, but it&#8217;s pretty good stuff. My favourite by far is still the coffee I bought in Cuba, of all places. Who ever heard of good Cuban coffee?</li>
<li>Speaking of good Cuban coffee, the cappuccinos Laura and I had in Cuba&#8230; wow. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever had better coffee anywhere. I&#8217;m not kidding. We got up in the morning and stumbled bleary-eyed into the heat just to enjoy one of those bad boys. And it was worth it. No matter how swelteringly hot it was outside.</li>
<li>I have been married for a year and one month. That&#8217;s&#8230; crazy. But awesome at the same time.</li>
<li>God&#8217;s plans are so much better than my plans are. Even when he works through hard means. I can attest to this personally. He turns things to good.</li>
<li>Mom just showed up at the office and is now fetching me a coffee &#8212; I hope. Either that or she forgot totally and I shall remain with no coffee left.</li>
<li>How do you make a really good pulled pork dish anyways? I&#8217;ve made a few educated guesses, but I don&#8217;t really know.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/09/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-noon-hour/" rel="bookmark">Bullet Points for a Tuesday Noon Hour</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-09-09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/09/bullet-points-for-a-tuesday-noon-hour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet Points for Monday Morning</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/08/bullet-points-for-monday-morning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/08/bullet-points-for-monday-morning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris asks a good question via Twitter: Is there a way to do church without burning leaders out? I think the answer comes back to something Joel Main and I talked about the other week. There are different ways to do church. We assume that church always revolves around a couple guys, but is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Chris asks a good question via Twitter: Is there a way to do church without burning leaders out? I think the answer comes back to something Joel Main and I talked about the other week. There are different ways to do church. We assume that church always revolves around a couple guys, but is that really how it has to work? What if the church is more of a collaborative environment where more people get involved? And what if instead of creating programs and activities with the implicit goal of getting people involved in peripheral matters, why not embed them at the heart of the whole thing? Of course the quality will go down as people with varying talent levels get involved, but church isn&#8217;t a stage show or some kind of theatre. Maybe sacrificing some polish would be a good thing. If it spared people&#8217;s marriages and drew people in and made authentic community.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m beginning to hate the word &#8220;authentic&#8221;. It&#8217;s so over-used &#8212; and by me, too, yes &#8212; that the word itself seems inauthentic. Which makes me wonder if what we mean when we say &#8220;authentic&#8221; is actually just &#8220;cool&#8221;. That thing that as soon as it become mainstream becomes uncool. Or unauthentic.</li>
<li>There are people I usually like a great deal who turn into raging idiots around politics. They become incensed that &#8220;their party&#8221; is being &#8220;attacked&#8221; and so they go on the offensive and &#8220;defend&#8221; them. This is true of both Republicans and Democrats, both Liberals and Conservatives, but it seems to be worse with those who mix religion and politics. More to the point, people who genuinely believe that the Republican party is another arm for the body of Christ seem to get more upset when their precious idol is under attack. I don&#8217;t know why this is. I know and respect many Republicans and Democrats who don&#8217;t do this. I know many who are measured and rational. But there&#8217;s always a few who seem to think they&#8217;re helping. But they&#8217;re not. They&#8217;re making arses of themselves.</li>
<li>Today I&#8217;m going to have some sort of burger for lunch. But because I took public transit &#8212; which really isn&#8217;t public, as I still had to pay for it: Why do I have to pay for public transit but not public healthcare? &#8212; I&#8217;ll have to walk there. I need an hour lunch break for exactly that reason.</li>
<li>I went to Nick&#8217;s profession of faith yesterday. It strikes me that before any of us go after the Catholic church for whatever doctrinal failings that branch of Christendom may espouse, we should clean up our own houses first. Especially when we&#8217;re still perpetuating a bunch of baroque rituals whose purposes are exemplary but whose roots are not in scripture. Even when you <em>know</em> the rituals aren&#8217;t grounded in scripture, and you can <em>say</em> as much. You can know what you like and say what you like but what you do is what matters. If you tacitly or implicitly put something on the level of scripture, you have absolutely no right to speak up against those who do so vocally and in the open.</li>
<li>I am hungry!</li>
<li>Laura and I went into Toronto for a while on Saturday and just walked around for a long time. It was fun: We don&#8217;t go to Toronto enough, it seems, even though we live on the border of Mississauga and Toronto. All this to say that one day I would very much like to live in downtown Toronto. Maybe not something as posh as Queen&#8217;s Quay, but something close to everything. It&#8217;s a grand city. Or, as Torontonians seem to blather on about, it&#8217;s a <em>world-class city</em>.</li>
<li>And that&#8217;s it folks! Also, I hope Obama wins. He&#8217;s the lesser of two evils, and I&#8217;m a great fan of rhetoric. Ever since I watched the West Wing, it seems, and developed a peripatetic crush on Aaron Sorkin.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/08/bullet-points-for-monday-morning/" rel="bookmark">Bullet Points for Monday Morning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-09-08.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/09/08/bullet-points-for-monday-morning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lunch</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/24/lunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/24/lunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan asks an interesting set of questions. 1. What time do you usually leave for lunch? Anywhere from 1130 to 1230 depending on what&#8217;s happening at work. The odd time I skip the whole dog and pony show altogether, but most days I take it. 2. How long do you usually take for lunch? I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bryanallain.com/blog/archives/2008/08/21/how-i-roll-lunch-work-edition/">Bryan asks an interesting set of questions.</a></p>
<p>1. What time do you usually leave for lunch?</p>
<p>Anywhere from 1130 to 1230 depending on what&#8217;s happening at work. The odd time I skip the whole dog and pony show altogether, but most days I take it.</p>
<p>2. How long do you usually take for lunch?</p>
<p>I get a half hour as mandated by Ontario law, and that&#8217;s it. Most days I&#8217;m under that. Rarely, I go over by a few minutes.</p>
<p>3. Ever eat lunch at home?</p>
<p>I suppose I could, as I live 10 minutes from home, but I dislike driving enough already thankyouverymuch.</p>
<p>4. What are your favorite places to eat out for Work Lunch?</p>
<p>Wendy&#8217;s or The Country Kitchen (part of Highland Farms). I don&#8217;t do that as often these days.</p>
<p>5. How often do you bring food in from home?</p>
<p>Almost every day. We always have something around here, even if it&#8217;s just a sandwich with lettuce, ham, provalone, horseradish mayonnaise, mustard, and pepper.</p>
<p>6. Are you a lone ranger or a community eater?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like eating with people. I&#8217;m solitary. Groups of larger than two &#8212; especially people I don&#8217;t know &#8212; make me long for solitude.</p>
<p>7. How often does your company pay for your lunch?</p>
<p>Never in a blue moon would my company pay for lunch. Well, there was that one time with the pizza.</p>
<p>8. What is your favourite lunch meal of all time?</p>
<p>Left-over pasta that I made. Especially angel hair noodles with a really nice sauce. The ground beef, Spanish onions, green onions, green pepper, red pepper, garlic, and diced Roma tomatoes kind. Kills me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/24/lunch/" rel="bookmark">Lunch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-08-24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/24/lunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things I think about whilst doing dishes… part the second.</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/22/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes%e2%80%a6-part-the-second/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/22/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes%e2%80%a6-part-the-second/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caedmon`s call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go again! One of the great tragedies of the modern church is that we&#8217;ve for the most part lost the language of covenant. We still have some of the ideas. But there&#8217;s hope. Imagine, if you will, the power of context and the power of covenant wedded to each other; perhaps this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Here we go again!</li>
<li>One of the great tragedies of the modern church is that we&#8217;ve for the most part lost the language of covenant. We still have some of the ideas. But there&#8217;s hope. Imagine, if you will, the power of context and the power of covenant wedded to each other; perhaps this is an unholy union of the ancient and the post-modern, but which covenant doesn&#8217;t have context? The church and God in the context of his schema of salvation; the covenant of marriage in the context of God and the church&#8217;s covenant; these are powerful concepts.</li>
<li>Share the Well is &#8212; and I hate to say this, as much as love Long Line of Leavers &#8212; probably the best Caedmon&#8217;s Call album ever. So many years and I still love CC. It&#8217;s true. I&#8217;ve listened to them longer than I&#8217;ve been a Christian.</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve heard it said that if God seems distant it&#8217;s probably because you&#8217;ve drawn away; the implicit assumption is, of course, that God is static and that he always wants to be close. In light of scripture, does this seem true? Are there not many people in scripture who were desperate to draw close to God only to find him still distant? I think when we talk about God we need to remember that he&#8217;s also a person, or a Person if you will, who has thoughts higher than ours and a plan greater than we can understand. God&#8217;s not static. He moves, we move, it&#8217;s the grand danse (as you may have heard said). If God seems distant and you don&#8217;t understand why &#8212; if you want to draw near and nothing happens &#8212; all you can say is that there is a reason. It&#8217;s almost blase in its simplicity. But there is a reason. Sometimes you don&#8217;t get to understand, sometimes you do, but there&#8217;s always a reason.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s hard to synthesise the appalling poverty most of the world labours in and the almost limitless prosperity we enjoy. The question is, of course, at what point does prosperity become a curse? This very blog begs ask that question: I have enough money to buy a computer and enough free time to contribute this ocean of dross that is the internet. How much time do I spend feeding the hungry and how much time do I spend feeding my own various hungers? How much should I?</li>
<li>Candace is getting baptised on Saturday, which is totally awesome. Baptisms are amazing things, no matter which side of the spectrum you fall on. It&#8217;s a powerful symbol no matter how you look on it. I&#8217;m a paedobatist by preference, but anyone who fulfils God&#8217;s command to baptise is terrific in my books. I have a special bit of confusion for &#8220;Reformed Baptist&#8221; (decide which side you&#8217;re on, you freaks!) who seem to have forgotten that Reformed theology leads inexorably to the baptism of children, but hey, it&#8217;s all good.</li>
<li>It seems to me that a little introspection and self-knowledge is a good thing, but a http://www.aldaily.com/lot leads to confusion. Maybe it&#8217;s because people function on a sort of quantum level: You measure yourself enough and you change. Then you have to start over again and it becomes a full-time occupation. And not a fun one.</li>
<li>Beer is proof that God loves us; dentist are proof he can change his mind.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m less three teeth, by the way.</li>
<li>You ever have it where you say, &#8220;It can&#8217;t get any better than this?&#8221; and then it does? Yeah. I got that. It&#8217;s called marriage. I&#8217;m an incurable optimist, it&#8217;s true.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.aldaily.com/">This is probably the best thing I have in my feeds.</a></li>
<li>It seems every nation has its legacy to overcome. US, India, China, all the big ones.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/22/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes%e2%80%a6-part-the-second/" rel="bookmark">Things I think about whilst doing dishes… part the second.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-08-22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/22/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes%e2%80%a6-part-the-second/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things I think about whilst doing dishes&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/19/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/19/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes when Laura leaves the house to go out and do whatever, I do dishes and listen to post-rock. You know, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, Explosions in the Sky, Mono, Red Sparrowes, that sort of thing. Right now I&#8217;m listening to This is Your Captain Speaking. It&#8217;s good stuff! If you&#8217;ve ever listened to post-rock, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Sometimes when Laura leaves the house to go out and do whatever, I do dishes and listen to post-rock. You know, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, Explosions in the Sky, Mono, Red Sparrowes, that sort of thing. Right now I&#8217;m listening to <b>This is Your Captain Speaking</b>. It&#8217;s good stuff! If you&#8217;ve ever listened to post-rock, you&#8217;ll know how hard it is to come across truly interesting material, even by those veterans of the genre such as (and especially) Mogwai. TIYCS seems interested in being interesting. That&#8217;s good.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t like megachurches. I mean, I can see where they fit into the ecosystem of Christianity &#8212; if it can be called an ecosystem as opposed to a burgeoning, idiotic choas &#8212; but I don&#8217;t like them. I don&#8217;t think I ever will. It&#8217;s not simply that they&#8217;re generally white, suburban, middle-class and almost always utterly devoted to not offending anyone. It&#8217;s that they&#8217;re not distributed enough. They&#8217;re too centralised. Thus, one pastor boffs his secretary, the whole thing goes under, and your sanctuary gets converted into indoor soccer field. I&#8217;m pretty sure churches should be small, efficient, face-to-face, involved, local, community-based, and active. But mostly small. Enough that you can&#8217;t hide in the crowds. But also enough that if something goes wrong, and entire faith community isn&#8217;t left floundering in the shallows.</li>
<li>Let me ask you this: Why do you dislike Thomas Kinkade&#8217;s art? Is it because his art is bad? I bet it isn&#8217;t. I bet you don&#8217;t know good art from bad art even if such things exist. What you probably mean to say, instead of, &#8220;I dislike Thoman Kinkade&#8217;s art,&#8221; is, &#8220;I dislike <em>Thomas Kinkade</em>&#8220;. That would probably be more accurate. You don&#8217;t like his commercialising of his art (but when was art ever not commercial?), you dislike his subject matter (though his paintings are quite nice to look at), and you especially dislike the types of people who buy his prints (you think they&#8217;re generally the unwashed white trash living in trailer parks somewhere, their floor and ceilings and furniture covered in linoleum). You don&#8217;t want to be one of them, because that wouldn&#8217;t be&#8230; something. Wouldn&#8217;t be cool, wouldn&#8217;t be acceptable to your peers, wouldn&#8217;t truly speak to your sensibilities and your good taste. Maybe what you should say instead is, &#8220;It&#8217;s not kosher to like Thomas Kinkade&#8230; so I don&#8217;t like him.&#8221; Because at least then you&#8217;d be a bit more honest. In the meantime, look at some of his paintings. They&#8217;re quite nice.</li>
<li>This may be some indie music heresy, but you know what&#8217;s wrong with My Bloody Valentine? They&#8217;re completely and mind-numbingly boring. Sure, they came up with sounds no-one had ever heard a guitar make before, but none of those sounds is <em>interesting</em>.</li>
<li>I hate modern classical music. I really do. Things started going off the rails in the early 1900s and haven&#8217;t gotten back on since. Once I thought, &#8220;Why have people accepted abstract art, but not abstract music?&#8221; The answer is, of course, that a bunch of different colours splashed on a canvas a la Pollock can be extraordinarily &#8212; if unintentionally &#8212; beautiful. It doesn&#8217;t hurt me to look at. Notes seemingly scribbled on a page at random, however, has the capability to make me &#8212; and from the look of it lots of people &#8212; wince. (I am abusing my dashes; I know.) Harmony and melody aren&#8217;t old social conventions meant to stifle the artists. They are a common framework in which we as Westerners operate. It may indeed be that this only a custom, but that doesn&#8217;t matter: It&#8217;s ingrained and there&#8217;s no point in the composer trying to wiggle it loose. You are literally hurting me with your atonal disasters, your craptastic 12-tone form, and your alternative rhythmic nightmare. Go write some music someone wants to listen to; see if there is perhaps something of value to be found in those old forms everyone seems to have abandoned without a reasonable alternatives. Rediscover, for heaven&#8217;s sake, the power of beautiful music. Don&#8217;t make it your mission to question what beauty <em>is</em>. It just is.</li>
<li>My, there are far too many dishes here.</li>
</ul>
<ul></ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/19/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes/" rel="bookmark">Things I think about whilst doing dishes&#8230;</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-08-19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/08/19/things-i-think-about-whilst-doing-dishes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I Have Open</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/05/21/what-i-have-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/05/21/what-i-have-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what I get for reading Ubuntu Planet. Another meme to make the people happy. This one is, what do you have open on your desktop? I&#8217;m including things that are living in my system tray as well. Tranmission Amarok gTwitter padevchooser Firefox (with four tabs) gnome-terminal F-Spot Hydrogen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I get for reading Ubuntu Planet. <a href="http://matthewhelmke.net/wordpress/2008/05/21/geek-poll-what-do-you-have-open/">Another meme to make the people happy.</a> This one is, what do you have open on your desktop? I&#8217;m including things that are living in my system tray as well.</p>
<p>Tranmission<br />
Amarok<br />
gTwitter<br />
padevchooser<br />
Firefox (with four tabs)<br />
gnome-terminal<br />
F-Spot<br />
Hydrogen</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/05/21/what-i-have-open/" rel="bookmark">What I Have Open</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-05-21.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/05/21/what-i-have-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four things that make me rather cross.</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/27/four-things-that-make-me-rather-cross/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/27/four-things-that-make-me-rather-cross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ttc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transit strikes. I can get on board with unions. They&#8217;re necessary to balance the interests of workers against the interests of corporations. I get that. Yet when it comes to transit workers, some of the most overpaid and impolite unionised individuals in existence barring perhaps automotive workers, I&#8217;m not on their side. Especially when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Transit strikes.</li>
</ul>
<p>I can get on board with unions. They&#8217;re necessary to balance the interests of workers against the interests of corporations. I get that. Yet when it comes to transit workers, some of the most overpaid and impolite unionised individuals in existence barring perhaps automotive workers, I&#8217;m not on their side. Especially when the TTC members reject an offer that would make them the highest paid transit workers in the country, even in the face of their union recommending they take the deal. Especially when they give an hour or less notice that they&#8217;ve decided to strike, stranding tens of thousands of people who count on the TTC to operate. They could not possibly have engendered less public support for their actions. Almost everyone I&#8217;ve talked to about the strike is <em>enraged</em> at the TTC. Couldn&#8217;t the union have simply started a work-to-rule campaign wherein they stopped accepting fares? That would have put pressure on the city without garnering for themselves the further, aggravated dislike of an entire city.</p>
<ul>
<li>Shark fin soup.</li>
</ul>
<p>I watched Sharkworld last night. The film is amazing, but the events portrayed in the film are a travesty. An unmitigated, utterly barbaric raping of the oceans. Frankly, anyone who eats shark fin soup should have his arms and legs chopped off and be left to starve on the side of a road somewhere. If flaunting your wealth involves damaging the life-support system of the <em>entire earth</em>, perhaps you should be made to feel the cost of that. I hope future generations look back on the Chinese and Taiwanese as a sort of barbarian race of ecological terrorists whose actions severely diminished the richness of the world&#8217;s oceans. Not that I have much of a high horse to speak from; Canada&#8217;s seal hunts and government subsidised fisheries are just as ruthless and unconcerned with long-term impact. Personally, I stopped eating fish &#8212; any fish, at all &#8212; about six months back, after reading A Short History of Nearly Everything. And it&#8217;s sad to see that a bunch of nutcases at Greenpeace are doing God&#8217;s work (in their own strange, rabid way) while the vast majority of Christians don&#8217;t bother to tend to the world&#8217;s largest garden: the seas.</p>
<ul>
<li>Evangelicals in bed with the Republican party</li>
</ul>
<p>Certainly after Mr Bush&#8217;s disastrous dual terms in office, some of the Republicans in the States must be second-guessing their religious affiliation with their party. That it took a bunch of crooks to do that is a great tragedy. That some will never question that affiliation is a greater tragedy still. Still, with the mythology of the Pilgrims and Religious Freedom and Democracy and Fighting The Evil British and God Is On Our Side still going strong, it&#8217;s not really that strange. It&#8217;s just&#8230; sad. America is no more on God&#8217;s side than Charlemagne or Constantine (whose <i>in hoc signo vinces</i> should still ring as an affront to the very ethic of Jesus, and one of the greatest lies the devil has managed to perpetuate over the ages). You mix your religion with your politics and you find that they make very bad bedfellows. Your religion must of course inform your political views, but politics must not ever inform your religion. Politics is about the exercise earthly power; Jesus is about the exercise of heavenly power. These things are very, very different. They are oil and water. You should not mix them up, or soon you find people painting Jesus on the side of their nuclear warheads.</p>
<ul>
<li>Cliches in sermons.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you are attempting to preach an authentic sermon, something that resonates in the hearts and minds of your listeners, don&#8217;t use cliches. Don&#8217;t use marketspeak. You&#8217;re not a motivational speaker. You&#8217;re not an entertainer. You must approach scripture and let it inform your method of preaching. People do not need handy bullet points that rhyme and have a particularly pleasing cadence. Bullet points do not impart truth, at least not any sort of useful truth. As anyone trying to implement and idea will tell you, it&#8217;s not simply enough to have a great idea: you need a great implementation. That is to say that while a turn of phrase might be handy to encapsulate the thrust of your message, the nuances are where the magic lies. Or, you might say, the difference between Mac OS X and Windows. There&#8217;s a reason Jesus used parables and not a lot of handy tracts. You can mine a parable for ages, you can look at it from different directions and see things you didn&#8217;t see before, you can over-analyse it, you can approach it with too much gravitas, you can do all kinds of things. A bullet point is boring. A bullet point that rhymes and sticks in your head is annoying <em>and</em> boring. </p>
<p>I have to expand on this. Jesus told stories that had a particular richness to them. They weren&#8217;t simple anecdotes with simple points. They were designed so you have to look at them just the right way &#8212; often in hindsight &#8212; to get the point. And often you&#8217;ll quite dislike the point because it hits you dead-centre. </p>
<p>These days preachers tend to tell stories both brief and humorous that make a particular broad point that lines up with their sermons. These stories are blunt instruments. They&#8217;re not really narrative: they&#8217;re cleverly disguised bullet points. There&#8217;s no meat. There&#8217;s no <em>content</em>. They&#8217;re like a dancing monkey with colourful clothes: it might be briefly entertaining, but you certainly wouldn&#8217;t want to marry the monkey. It&#8217;s just a monkey. Take off all the clothes and strip away the dancing routine and it&#8217;s just a monkey. And you&#8217;ll find that monkeys are rather boring, after all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to be told the truth. Not a particularly one-dimensional version of the truth that can fit in three points and thirty minutes. If telling the truth means you need to go into overtime and tell stories and confuse me and dig deeper than I&#8217;m prepared to go, DO IT. God knows I&#8217;m never going to do that myself, willingly.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/27/four-things-that-make-me-rather-cross/" rel="bookmark">Four things that make me rather cross.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-04-27.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/27/four-things-that-make-me-rather-cross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Favourite Bands</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/14/my-favourite-bands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/14/my-favourite-bands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/?p=1520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend, someone asked me what my favourite bands are. I didn&#8217;t really know what to say, except that I love Radiohead and everything else flows out from there. Today, my curiosity piqued, I began to wonder what, statistically, are my favourite bands? Last.fm and my scrupulously collected statistics to the rescue. I present for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend, someone asked me what my favourite bands are. I didn&#8217;t really know what to say, except that I love Radiohead and everything else flows out from there. Today, my curiosity piqued, I began to wonder what, statistically, are my favourite bands?</p>
<p>Last.fm and my scrupulously collected statistics to the rescue. I present for your consideration the top fifteen or so.</p>
<p>1. Philip Glass<br />
2. Band of Horses<br />
3. Sufjan Stevens<br />
4. The Books<br />
5. Boards of Canada<br />
6. Snow Patrol<br />
7. Derek Webb<br />
8. Radiohead<br />
9. Death Cab for Cutie<br />
10. Iron &#038; Wine<br />
11. Modest Mouse<br />
12. Bright Eyes<br />
13. Steve Reich<br />
14. Grandaddy<br />
15. Andrew Bird </p>
<p>That Boards of Canada is on that list surprises even me. I had no idea.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/14/my-favourite-bands/" rel="bookmark">My Favourite Bands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-04-14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/04/14/my-favourite-bands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet points for a Wednesday Morning.</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/02/20/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/02/20/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talkdemonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/02/20/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t get stat holidays. I really don&#8217;t. If every person gets a certain number of days off per year for government-mandated vacation, why are there additional days off? I&#8217;ll probably understand this when I&#8217;m older and slower but for now they just annoy me. They throw a monkey wrench into my normally placid finances [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>I don&#8217;t get stat holidays. I really don&#8217;t. If every person gets a certain number of days off per year for government-mandated vacation, why are there additional days off? I&#8217;ll probably understand this when I&#8217;m older and slower but for now they just annoy me. They throw a monkey wrench into my normally placid finances (I don&#8217;t have much money, but what money I do have is somewhat consistent), throw a hyena wrench into production at the shop (a four day week in which to do five days of work! hooray!), and just generally throw off my sense of time.</li>
<li>Fourteen hours. I worked fourteen hours yesterday. Just to be clear, I&#8217;m not a workaholic, I actually don&#8217;t like doing that. But sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do, right?</li>
<li>Why do we make word that end in &#8220;aholic&#8221; when we mean to say someone is addicted to something? It doesn&#8217;t make any sense. It should be &#8220;workic&#8221;, not &#8220;workaholic&#8221;. One of those has much less snap, of course.</li>
<li>Clicking on the tag buttons is much easier than writing out tags. If they had keyboard shortcuts, it&#8217;d be even better.</li>
<li>For the love of all that&#8217;s good, don&#8217;t keep apologising to me. Don&#8217;t be sorry, do your job properly. Then we&#8217;re both happy.</li>
<li>Ever have a night of tossing and turning? I had one of those last night, only to roll out of bed and discover Laura slept like a babe in arms. I suppose that&#8217;s okay, though. I&#8217;ll give up my sleep for her in one of those mystical marital transactions that seem to happen with some frequency. We&#8217;re rarely both sick, or both hungry, or both interested in watching the same film; life is strange that way. People are strange that way.</li>
<li>I&#8217;d like to observe that even lukewarm coffee is better than no coffee at all, which pretty much blows that whole &#8220;warm, cold, lukewarm&#8221; example of Paul&#8217;s out of the water. Of course, he didn&#8217;t really have coffee. I try to imagine Paul of caffeine, and I sort of imagine him like, &#8220;We&#8217;re going to North America, beeyotches!&#8221; I think he might get quite annoying, actually.</li>
<li>Last night Laura and I read from Luke where Jesus talks about the end times, and I have to say that scripture confuses me sometimes. At one point the passage says that the end times (if it was actually talking about the end times) will come when people are eating and drinking and getting married, just like in the days of Lot and Noah&#8230; and says that these signs are like vultures gathered around a carcass. Which is nice imagery, but doesn&#8217;t help me much, because I see people eating and drinking and getting married right now. Maybe I&#8217;m just getting confused about nothing. I just don&#8217;t get it.</li>
<li>I love Talkdemonic&#8217;s &#8220;In the Machinery of Night&#8221;. It&#8217;s like they took equal parts IDM, hip-hop drumming, and awesome and mixed it all together to get an amazing song. Note my use of superlatives here.</li>
<li>The Dilbert comic about the guy who has no skills but compensates by &#8220;raising issues&#8221; resonates with me this morning. I won&#8217;t tell you why because that would be mean.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/02/20/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-5/" rel="bookmark">Bullet points for a Wednesday Morning.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2008-02-20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2008/02/20/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-morning-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet points for a Wednesday afternoon.</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/28/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-afternoon-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/28/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-afternoon-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/28/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-afternoon-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am unbelievably sick of people who always say things like, &#8220;Well, what are you doing about it?&#8221; It&#8217;s one of those cop-out phrases. Like how you can say &#8220;lighten up!&#8221; as a way of being a jerk. Or how you can say &#8220;deal with it!&#8221; as a way of avoiding having to deal with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>I am unbelievably sick of people who always say things like, &#8220;Well, what are you doing about it?&#8221; It&#8217;s one of those cop-out phrases. Like how you can say &#8220;lighten up!&#8221; as a way of being a jerk. Or how you can say &#8220;deal with it!&#8221; as a way of avoiding having to deal with it. Either you agree or you don&#8217;t. If you say &#8220;put up or shut up!&#8221; then you follow your own advice.</li>
<li>How do you know when you&#8217;ve drunk too much coffee? Where&#8217;s that point where you say enough?</li>
<li>I&#8217;m having one of those days where everything is terribly busy and nothing seems to get done. Yeah, I&#8217;m blogging for a minute, but the rest of the day seems to be filled with doing things and more doing things, only when I look back I don&#8217;t see the results of having done any of those things.</li>
<li>Laura and I had tacos for dinner last night. A simple, cheap, and delicious meal. I think we might do that more often.</li>
<li>There&#8217;s a writer&#8217;s strike going on in TV land right now, in case you didn&#8217;t know. That means that all our favourite shows are over and done with, maybe or probably for the season. No more How I Met Your Mother, no more Big Bang Theory, no more House, no more Scrubs, no more Pushing Daisies. Sad times. But we can go back and watch things we missed, like 30 Rock, and&#8230; that&#8217;s about it. It&#8217;s one of my favourite new shows now.</li>
<li>I would like my desktop to be able to follow me anywhere I go. Why is that not possible? Why can&#8217;t I call my desktop up securely on a public terminal? I know, the staggering technical hurdles and the nightmare of implementing this idea. But&#8230; super cool, right?</li>
<li>I&#8217;m away from the Rumour Forum for a while, guys. Except for the boards I have access to, and they&#8217;re not much. But when I come roaring back to the fold, my pockets stuffed to overflowing with cash money dollars, it&#8217;ll be a day to celebrate.</li>
<p><img src="/daniel/i/buildings.jpg"/><br />
<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/attackcat/">Attribution</a> / <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/">License</a></ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/28/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-afternoon-2/" rel="bookmark">Bullet points for a Wednesday afternoon.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2007-11-28.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/28/bullet-points-for-a-wednesday-afternoon-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet points for a Friday morning.</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/02/bullet-points-for-a-friday-morning-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/02/bullet-points-for-a-friday-morning-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tasers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/02/bullet-points-for-a-friday-morning-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s my mom&#8217;s birthday. Happy Birthday mom! I hope you read this blog every once and while&#8230; because I tried calling you and you were out getting milk. On the elevator up to our apartment yesterday, I realised I have a thing for churches whose names involve water somehow. I used to attend Living Water, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Today&#8217;s my mom&#8217;s birthday. Happy Birthday mom! I hope you read this blog every once and while&#8230; because I tried calling you and you were out getting milk.</li>
<li>On the elevator up to our apartment yesterday, I realised I have a thing for churches whose names involve water somehow. I used to attend Living Water, then I attended The Bridge (is dead, long live The Bridge!), and now Laura and I are tenatively attending Freshwater in Mississauga. It&#8217;s a small church, quite similar in character to The Bridge, and from what I&#8217;ve heard thus far, the preaching has been absolutely spot on.</li>
<li>That sort of brings to mind how blessed I&#8217;ve been with the sort of preaching I&#8217;ve been priviledged to hear over the last few years.
<ul>
<li>At Living Water, Pastor Vogel has the sort of passion for preaching you don&#8217;t get to hear much anymore, and a soft spot for alliterative bullet points (who doesn&#8217;t!). His sermons always provoked me to thought; sometimes I would fill entire sheets with observations about what I&#8217;d heard. I still have quite a few of those sheets at home, I think.</li>
<li>At The Bridge, Robb Powell, who also married me and Laura, had a sort of calm rationality about his preaching. He&#8217;d throw out so much stuff in one sermon that I&#8217;d almost get brain overload. I&#8217;d have to chew on it for hours later.</li>
<li>I haven&#8217;t heard much of Joel Main at Freshwater yet, but from what I have heard he has a remarkable capability for historical analysis and context, and a passion to bring Jesus to life (yes, I know the Holy Ghost already did that) and make him seem real in all his Godhead and humanity.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>This morning I poured hot water all over my hand. The throbbing has subsided, thankfully. I topped that off with spilling my tea all over the floor at work about two hours later. Frankly, I feel like an idiot. Or, like Chandler, I&#8217;m a dropper. It&#8217;s true.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m currently gathering information about tasers. If you have a link or something, please do post it in the comments! I&#8217;ll be ever so grateful.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/02/bullet-points-for-a-friday-morning-3/" rel="bookmark">Bullet points for a Friday morning.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2007-11-02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/11/02/bullet-points-for-a-friday-morning-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s hobby&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/19/todays-hobby-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/19/todays-hobby-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hobbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/19/todays-hobby-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using British slang that either sounds naughty in Canada, or doesn&#8217;t sound naughty when it should: Hey, can I bum a fag? Of course I like your son! He&#8217;s a proper little tosser, that one! This is my happy sack. Anything that makes me happy, I keep in here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using British slang that either sounds naughty in Canada, or doesn&#8217;t sound naughty when it should:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hey, can I bum a fag?</li>
<li>Of course I like your son! He&#8217;s a proper little tosser, that one!</li>
<li>This is my happy sack. Anything that makes me happy, I keep in here.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/19/todays-hobby-2/" rel="bookmark">Today&#8217;s hobby&#8230;</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2007-10-19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/19/todays-hobby-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s hobby&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/12/todays-hobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/12/todays-hobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hobbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whyaremytagsalwaysplurals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/12/todays-hobby/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inventing plausible-sounding pseudo-executive buzz-phrases. Examples: I have integrated this into our pricing meta-structure. We need to combine our beta output to reduce chances of triple redundancy. A EMI field is interfering with your LAN, causing the bandlength to reach critical theta proportions. Restart your computer. Make sure you re-calibrate the negative valence detectors before you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inventing plausible-sounding pseudo-executive buzz-phrases. Examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>I have integrated this into our pricing meta-structure.</li>
<li>We need to combine our beta output to reduce chances of triple redundancy.</li>
<li>A EMI field is interfering with your LAN, causing the bandlength to reach critical theta proportions. Restart your computer.</li>
<li>Make sure you re-calibrate the negative valence detectors before you leave tonight.</li>
</ul>
<p>It never fails to leave at least someone smiling.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/12/todays-hobby/" rel="bookmark">Today&#8217;s hobby&#8230;</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel">We Should See Other Blogs</a> on 2007-10-12.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2007/10/12/todays-hobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

