There is still good in the world.
daniel on Dec 9th 2008
I’m listening to a first-rate performance and recording of Steve Reich’s “Music For 18 Musicians”. It’s absolutely fabulous still, after all these years.
In any case, I figure if I can subject myself to “The Rite of Spring” at the TSO and have to deal with music that hasn’t any meaningful harmony or structure, the least I can do to achieve balance is imbibe a great deal of music that’s nothing but.
Filed in main | 7 responses so far
7 Responses to “There is still good in the world.”




![About the [rmfo-blogs] service. [rmfo-blogs.com]](http://rmfo-blogs.com/images/rmfoblog.png)
I am unfamiliar with “Music For 18 Musicians”. I shall have to give it a try.
Definitely find a place where you can preview it before you buy it. It’s an interesting piece, but it’s also a polarising piece.
whoa whoa whoa…did you just say, subject myself to the rite of spring? no meaningful harmony or structure? i think you’re confusing stravinsky with schoenberg. yeah, it’s got some pretty staggering harmonies, and some mega-complex rhythms, and perhaps it is asymmetrical…but that piece was a 30-minute revolution, the kind of which has scarcely been witnessed in the history of western music. it’s one of the defining pieces of the 20th-century.
(steve reich…he’s good, too.)
All of the things you said may in fact be true, but I still didn’t like it except on a really visceral level. I think the harmony and structure defied any concept of harmony and structure. I know Schoenberg took this further (I’ve tried listening to 12-tone and process music… it’s not easy to do!) but The Rite of Spring really gave that whole modern classical thing a kick in the pants.
[...] Elsewhere in Dreams » Blog Archive » There is still good in the world. (tags: cjh_comment) [...]
fair enough.
i think it’s a staggering work of awesome.
I’m not disagreeing at all!
I just didn’t enjoy it much.