Ubuntu pushes a lot of updates.

Ubuntu pushes a lot of updates. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, except that it uses a lot of bandwidth, and has a single point of failure.

If I’m right, service providers are going to be moving to a per gigabyte approach in selling bandwidth in the next few year (if they haven’t already in places like Australia) at which point bandwidth use might become highly relevant.

In the meantime, we still have updates being pushed from the Ubuntu main servers (generally) unless you specify otherwise. This single point of failure (not to mention bandwidth costs for Canonical) seems a little bit behind the times. Everyone uses P2P apps like Deluge to download files; why should Apt not do the same?

I think what we need is a future-looking new Apt delivery system, but also a future-looking .deb format. Imagine if you could (just for instance; I have no idea if this is feasible or not) download a binary diff and patch your updates on to the existing binaries instead of downloading the entire binary and replacing it. And that’s just what my little brain could come up with.

Imagine also that apt-torrent (or whatever it’s called) is enabled by default and across the internet there are thousands and even millions of seed for every given update over a given period of time. That would be pretty neat, I think.

Tags: , , ,

Tags: , , ,

3 Responses to “Ubuntu pushes a lot of updates.”

  1. Chris Hubbs Says:

    apt-torrent would be AWESOME. Additionally, Subversion already handles transmitting diffs-only for file updates. Not sure how easy it would be to merge those two technologies together, but even one of the two would be a good start. I, too, get tired of seeing the orange and red arrows up in the menu bar almost every day.

  2. links for 2008-11-20 - chrishubbs.com Says:

    [...] Elsewhere in Dreams » Blog Archive » Ubuntu pushes a lot of updates. (tags: cjh_comment) [...]

  3. none Says:

    I agreed

    http://my.opera.com/ubuntunerd1/blog/

Leave a Reply