<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment spam.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/</link>
	<description>A personal narrative.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Scott, I was wondering about that. I had a huge increase in spam after the post about the spam. Is it co-incidence? Or do the spammers troll for blogs that complain and then punish them? :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To quote some mafia movie, &quot;It&#039;s just business.  Nothing personal.&quot;

Seriously, they don&#039;t care.  They&#039;re just looking for targets of opportunity.  Caring means that they would be inefficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Scott, I was wondering about that. I had a huge increase in spam after the post about the spam. Is it co-incidence? Or do the spammers troll for blogs that complain and then punish them? :)</p></blockquote>
<p>To quote some mafia movie, &#8220;It&#8217;s just business.  Nothing personal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously, they don&#8217;t care.  They&#8217;re just looking for targets of opportunity.  Caring means that they would be inefficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>Scott, I was wondering about that. I had a huge increase in spam after the post about the spam. Is it co-incidence? Or do the spammers troll for blogs that complain and then punish them? :)

Roger, you pretty much can&#039;t have a WP blog these days without something like Spam Karma being set up. It&#039;s a great program, though, eh?


dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I was wondering about that. I had a huge increase in spam after the post about the spam. Is it co-incidence? Or do the spammers troll for blogs that complain and then punish them? :)</p>
<p>Roger, you pretty much can&#8217;t have a WP blog these days without something like Spam Karma being set up. It&#8217;s a great program, though, eh?</p>
<p>dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 23:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>I had to set up Spam Karma on my site again yesterday.  So far I had made it since my last upgrade without doing it.  1,000 comments in 3 days changed my mind, though.  You&#039;re right; it is getting worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to set up Spam Karma on my site again yesterday.  So far I had made it since my last upgrade without doing it.  1,000 comments in 3 days changed my mind, though.  You&#8217;re right; it is getting worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3977</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 20:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-3977</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably because you wrote a post with the word Spam in it.  Spam, like the Devil, gets attracted when you use it&#039;s name  :)

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably because you wrote a post with the word Spam in it.  Spam, like the Devil, gets attracted when you use it&#8217;s name  :)</p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>Dave, the spam isn&#039;t actually getting through. But it&#039;s crazy enough... yesterday I got 350-some spam. A sudden exponential increase and I have no idea why.


dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, the spam isn&#8217;t actually getting through. But it&#8217;s crazy enough&#8230; yesterday I got 350-some spam. A sudden exponential increase and I have no idea why.</p>
<p>dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 23:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-2980</guid>
		<description>You need to set up a verification of some sort.  That&#039;s what I had to do on my blog.  It sucks for all us poor commenters but sometimes our existance must be defined by the unsavory members of society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to set up a verification of some sort.  That&#8217;s what I had to do on my blog.  It sucks for all us poor commenters but sometimes our existance must be defined by the unsavory members of society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 23:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>I dont get comment spam on my blogger but all my friends do its weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont get comment spam on my blogger but all my friends do its weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/daniel/2006/05/18/comment-spam/#comment-2885</guid>
		<description>Try getting 692, which is what I got yesterday ... on just one of my Weblogs.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try getting 692, which is what I got yesterday &#8230; on just one of my Weblogs.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
